megs 105 vs megs 95

well here is dilemma, i was gona get 105 but then noticed that 95 is pretty much same thing and looks like it has more lubricants to get longer work time. any disadvantage to get 95 instead of 105?

ok found my answer. here is responce from Mike at autogeek

 

105 is completely non-diminishing abrasives and 95 has both non and diminishing abrasives. It doesn't have quite the cut as 105.

 

105/205 is a stunning combo!

 

^^^ that was not the question, i already know that

 

You may find this MOL thread of interest. See esp Kevin Brown's comments.

 

^^ thanks but his coments made no sence at all to me. he talks about 95 without answering main questions. so to me its BLAH BLAH BLAH. i could have found that info on megs website im sure. that guy had bad reading comprehension. it was asked what was difference between one and other not describe one product


Asphalt Rocket's one sentence made more since and answered question that that guys whole paragraph

 

Thanks, I like to answer a question without all the fluff trying to make ones self look like they know what they are talking about. No baffle with bs from me.:thumb:

 

I like #95 with wools and foamed wools because of its longer working time I don't have to stop repeatedly like I do with M105. #95 works like a polish aside from its non diminishing abrasive setup.

However I still like both for different situations

 

hmmm. i guess i will need to get samples of both before i get galon

somebody mentioned adding mineral oil to 105 to extend working time. is that true or bs? if true what kinda mineral oil?

 

so im getting 105, probably gallon of it

 

A gallon???

Why?

 

couse my friend might want this as well couse he was intrested so for price of 2 32 oz bottles i can get a gallon and split it and get twice as much for same price and its as good as they say why wouldnt you get a gallon, but i might just get 32 of 95 and 105

 

how would 95 compare to 203? is cut on 95 more then 203?